Difference between revisions of "List of Problems"

From Mobius Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 38: Line 38:
  
 
:* in the 2nd to last paragraph of the [[Solving_Models#Flat_State_Space_Generator|Flat State Space Generator]] section, in the .tex version of the manual there's a comment that reads: (TAC): we should define stabilizing\index{stabilizing} and well specified\index{well specified}...
 
:* in the 2nd to last paragraph of the [[Solving_Models#Flat_State_Space_Generator|Flat State Space Generator]] section, in the .tex version of the manual there's a comment that reads: (TAC): we should define stabilizing\index{stabilizing} and well specified\index{well specified}...
 +
 +
:* the Hash Value text box section under Parameters puts 0.5 as a math equation, which makes it look obnoxious. should it just be left like that or be changed to just regular text, no math condition set on it?

Revision as of 20:28, 7 March 2014

For review and correction:

  • the formatting for math equations is really obnoxious and not smooth at all in the text
  • figure 1.3 in Modeling Background in the Enabling and completion rules for actions sub-subsection only shows diagrams (a)-(c), but the paragraph talks about a fourth possible (d) scenario. You'll have to scroll down just a little.
  • there's something just grammatically wrong with the NEW bullet point and I'm not quite sure what the original intended comment is supposed to be/how to re-word this. The second sentence.
  • the last sentence of the Remote Shell Command bullet under External Tools is unable to reference whatever appendix section it's supposed to be (\ref{sec:remoteshell}), and I'm not sure if that's supposed to be "man" or or perhaps "main"?
  • in the last paragraph under Tree View, I feel like parent and child should be switched around, but I'm not sure.
  • reference to unknown section under the Import bullet point (\ref{sec:projman_sets}).
  • this is just a formatting concern: shouldn't Close be in the same typeset as Delete and all the others (in the description under the Close paragraph)?
  • second paragraph under Activities, first sentence - "predictes"? is that right?
    • not sure how to link to another figure on a different page directly - see end of second paragraph under Execution policy.
  • under Instantaneous transition, is the Arc Cardinality bullet supposed to be the exact same as it was for Timed transition?
  • under the Elements menu, the images are kind of bigger than what's in the pdf version. is there a way/should they be made into smaller icons? (the pdf manual also has each image placed in a box so each image has a thin black outline)
  • figure under Simulation has same caption as a previous figure
  • in the pdf version, Response surface model selection isn't a bolded section - is it supposed to be a new section (9.8.2 in the pdf manual instead of ANOVA, and ANOVA is 9.8.3) or is it supposed to be a sub-section of Factorial model selection?
- in that section, 2nd paragraph, does "Section 3.5" refer to actual Section 3.5 or does it mean 8.5 (because in the tex manual chapter 9 is labeled as though it were chapter 4); there is no link
- also, the \ldots function in math mode makes the dots look like they're in the center of the parentheses and not at the bottom (just a side note)
  • in the 4th paragraph under the ANOVA section, it references Section 3.6 with no internal link. Is that supposed to be Section 8.6?
  • the 1st paragraph under Diagnostic Plots references a previous figure that "shows the panel with an example normal plot of studentized residuals", but the next figure has "Normal plot of studentized residuals" as its description. Is the 1st paragraph referencing the correct figure?
  • in the 2nd to last paragraph of the Flat State Space Generator section, in the .tex version of the manual there's a comment that reads: (TAC): we should define stabilizing\index{stabilizing} and well specified\index{well specified}...
  • the Hash Value text box section under Parameters puts 0.5 as a math equation, which makes it look obnoxious. should it just be left like that or be changed to just regular text, no math condition set on it?

For review and correction:

  • the formatting for math equations is really obnoxious and not smooth at all in the text
  • figure 1.3 in Modeling Background in the Enabling and completion rules for actions sub-subsection only shows diagrams (a)-(c), but the paragraph talks about a fourth possible (d) scenario. You'll have to scroll down just a little.
  • there's something just grammatically wrong with the NEW bullet point and I'm not quite sure what the original intended comment is supposed to be/how to re-word this. The second sentence.
  • the last sentence of the Remote Shell Command bullet under External Tools is unable to reference whatever appendix section it's supposed to be (\ref{sec:remoteshell}), and I'm not sure if that's supposed to be "man" or or perhaps "main"?
  • in the last paragraph under Tree View, I feel like parent and child should be switched around, but I'm not sure.
  • reference to unknown section under the Import bullet point (\ref{sec:projman_sets}).
  • this is just a formatting concern: shouldn't Close be in the same typeset as Delete and all the others (in the description under the Close paragraph)?
  • second paragraph under Activities, first sentence - "predictes"? is that right?
    • not sure how to link to another figure on a different page directly - see end of second paragraph under Execution policy.
  • under Instantaneous transition, is the Arc Cardinality bullet supposed to be the exact same as it was for Timed transition?
  • under the Elements menu, the images are kind of bigger than what's in the pdf version. is there a way/should they be made into smaller icons? (the pdf manual also has each image placed in a box so each image has a thin black outline)
  • figure under Simulation has same caption as a previous figure
  • in the pdf version, Response surface model selection isn't a bolded section - is it supposed to be a new section (9.8.2 in the pdf manual instead of ANOVA, and ANOVA is 9.8.3) or is it supposed to be a sub-section of Factorial model selection?
- in that section, 2nd paragraph, does "Section 3.5" refer to actual Section 3.5 or does it mean 8.5 (because in the tex manual chapter 9 is labeled as though it were chapter 4); there is no link
- also, the \ldots function in math mode makes the dots look like they're in the center of the parentheses and not at the bottom (just a side note)
  • in the 4th paragraph under the ANOVA section, it references Section 3.6 with no internal link. Is that supposed to be Section 8.6?
  • the 1st paragraph under Diagnostic Plots references a previous figure that "shows the panel with an example normal plot of studentized residuals", but the next figure has "Normal plot of studentized residuals" as its description. Is the 1st paragraph referencing the correct figure?
  • in the 2nd to last paragraph of the Flat State Space Generator section, in the .tex version of the manual there's a comment that reads: (TAC): we should define stabilizing\index{stabilizing} and well specified\index{well specified}...